Retrospective study reveals high inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-critically ill patients, highlighting risks and guidelines.
Purpose: To investigate the appropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in non-critically ill hospitalized patients. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study that included all non-critically ill adult patients (n = 369) admitted to the General Medical Wards of King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The patients were administered proton pump inhibitors such as esomeprazole and omeprazole; histamine-2 receptor antagonists such as ranitidine; and cytoprotective agents such as sucralfate in different dosage regimens. Baseline characteristics, risk factors, and acid-suppressive therapy were evaluated based on therapeutic guidelines of the Society for Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) on stress ulcer prophylaxis. Results: A total of 369 patients were included in the study with mean age of 61.65 ± 18.83 years. Diabetes mellitus was the most encountered comorbidity 169 (45.8 %). Dual antiplatelet use was the most encountered medication 79 (21.94 %) with only 55 (14.9 %) patients meeting the criteria of the American Society for Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) Therapeutic Guidelines on stress ulcer prophylaxis. Proton-pump inhibitors were the most used 358 (97.02 %) in acid suppressive therapy. Conclusion: Inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis is high in this study leading to increase in medication adverse effects. The findings of this study will help in implementing a comprehensive protocol to closely follow up on all admitted patients who use stress ulcer prophylaxis for certain indications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AlMolaiki et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: