Key result
rTM administration over seven days shows no 28-day survival benefit versus six days in infection-induced DIC.
Why the study?
The clinical factors affecting recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin administration duration and its association with survival in infection-induced DIC patients were unclear.
Does a shorter duration (≤6 days) of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin administration improve 28-day survival compared to >7 days in patients with infection-induced DIC?
Observational (n=64)
No
Does a shorter duration (≤6 days) of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin administration improve 28-day survival compared to >7 days in patients with infection-induced DIC?
An rTM administration duration of within six days may be a viable, cost-saving option for infection-induced DIC, as it showed no significant difference in 28-day survival compared to longer administration.
rTM duration factors in infection-induced DIC merit cautious consideration; leaves open optimal strategies for prospective trials.
We retrospectively studied recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rTM) administration duration and survival rate and the clinical factors affecting rTM administration duration in patients with infection-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). We included patients with infection-induced DIC at Kushiro City General Hospital who met the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC criteria and received rTM between April 2014 and March 2018. Sixty-four patients were categorized into two groups according to rTM administration duration: administration within six days (n = 49) and administration over seven days (n = 15). The 28-day survival rate of the two groups, stratified by rTM administration duration, was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis to investigate the association between rTM administration duration and survival rate. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine clinical factors affecting rTM administration duration. There was no significant association between rTM administration duration and survival rate (P = 0.549). but a combination of immunoglobulins was significantly associated with prolonged rTM administration duration (P < 0.01). Furthermore, a higher white blood cell (WBC) count and higher creatinine clearance (CCr) were significantly associated with a shorter rTM administration duration (P < 0.01 and P = 0.023, respectively). Given the high cost, an rTM administration duration of within six days may be an option. Additionally, a higher WBC count or higher CCr before rTM administration is expected to shorten rTM administration duration. Because of the small sample size and single-center retrospective observational design of this study, a multicenter prospective study is needed to robustly validate our results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanno et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Infection-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) (n=64). Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin administration over 7 days vs. Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin administration within 6 days was evaluated on 28-day survival rate (p=0.549). Administration of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin for over seven days did not significantly improve the 28-day survival rate compared to administration within six days in patients with infection-induced DIC.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: