Key result
Genomic profiling and single-cell transcriptomics show potential to improve multiple sclerosis diagnosis.
Why the study?
Current genetic knowledge explains up to half of MS heritability, raising questions about its sufficiency to improve MS diagnosis using genetic and transcriptomic data.
Can genetic and gene expression signatures improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis?
Can genetic and gene expression signatures improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis?
Recent advancements in genetics and single-cell transcriptomics have the potential to significantly improve the early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
MS genetics explain only half of heritability; leaves open roles for rare variants and environment in future studies.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) exhibits a well-documented increased incidence in individuals with respective family history, that is, is a heritable disease. In the last decade, genome-wide association studies have enabled the agnostic interrogation of the whole genome at a large scale. To date, over 200 genetic associations have been described at the strict level of genome-wide significance. Our current understanding of MS genetics can explain up to half of the disease's heritability, raising the important question of whether this is enough information to leverage toward improving diagnosis in MS. Parallel advancements in technologies that allow the characterization of the full transcriptome down to the single-cell level have enabled the generation of an unprecedented wealth of information. Transcriptional changes of putative causal cells could be utilized to identify early signs of disease onset. These recent findings in genetics and genomics, coupled with new technologies and deeply phenotyped cohorts, have the potential to improve the diagnosis of MS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patsopoulos et al. (2020) conducted a review in Multiple sclerosis. Recent findings in genetics and genomics, including over 200 genetic associations and single-cell transcriptomics, have the potential to improve the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: