Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CaO is an attractive CO 2 acceptor, due to its good kinetics and high capture capacity, even under low CO 2 concentration conditions. The major problem associated with CaO acceptors is the loss of CO 2 capture capacity during cyclic operations. The declining performance of the CaO acceptors is more pronounced in the presence of steam. In this article we propose a method for fabrication of nano-CaO acceptors coated with a ZrO 2 layer to improve the stability. The nano-CaO acceptor was prepared by a thermal decomposition method following coating by a sol–gel, incipient wet impregnation, or hydrolysis process. Thermogravimetric analysis of the cyclic process of CO 2 carbonation/decarbonation revealed that the nano-CaO acceptors with sol–gel (CaO-SG) and wet impregnation (CaO-IM) coatings have higher CO 2 capture capacity and longer lifetime than the uncoated ones. The capture capacity of CaO-IM declined after 14 cycles, whereas CaO-SG remained stable up to 20 cycles. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and Raman spectroscopy were used to characterize the coated and uncoated nano-CaO structures. Combined characterization techniques showed that a CaZrO 3 layer was formed around the nano-CaO particles by sol–gel coating. Multicycle carbonation/decarbonation processes were performed in the absence and in the presence of steam in CO 2 capture kinetics experiments as well as under the sorption-enhanced reforming conditions, and CaO nanoparticles with a surface CaZrO 3 layer showed promising cyclic stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
- et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: