Key result
SuturTek FCD closes fascia ~23% faster than traditional closure with similar accuracy and bursting pressures.
Why the study?
The accuracy and efficacy of fascial closure using the SuturTek 360 degrees Fascial Closure Device have never been objectively determined.
Does the SuturTek 360 degrees Fascial Closure Device improve closure time, accuracy, and strength compared to traditional suture closure in a porcine midline laparotomy model?
RCT (n=10)
randomly assigned
Does the SuturTek 360 degrees Fascial Closure Device improve closure time, accuracy, and strength compared to traditional suture closure in a porcine midline laparotomy model?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.9% vs 7.7%
p-value: p=.012
The SuturTek 360 degrees Fascial Closure Device provides faster fascial closure with similar accuracy and strength compared to traditional open techniques in a porcine model.
May reduce needle-stick risk in laparotomy; leaves open human efficacy and safety pending clinical trials.
Abdominal fascial closure after midline laparotomy can be time-consuming and inaccurate and is a common time for needle-stick injuries. The SuturTek 360 degrees Fascial Closure Device (FCD) is designed to provide a secure fascial closure while reducing the risk of needle-stick injury. To date, the accuracy and efficacy of the fascial closure obtained with this device have never been objectively determined. Ten pigs averaging 18 kg were killed and underwent a midline laparotomy. Idealized suture locations were premarked through the fascia. The animals were then randomly assigned to either a traditional suture closure or the FCD for fascial closure. Surgeons were instructed to place sutures through the idealized markers. Surgeons were then evaluated based on the time to close fascia and distance from the markers. Abdominal bursting pressures were obtained using a manometric balloon. Accuracy was also tested on an ex vivo model on which the participants were again asked to place stitches as close as possible to idealized marks, and absolute distance from the idealized location was calculated. The FCD resulted in a faster closure time when compared with traditional closure (5.9 +/- 0.6 vs 7.7 +/- 1.0 minute, P = .012), with a similar accuracy of placement from the idealized markers (1.5 +/- 1.4 mm vs 0.8 +/- 1.1 mm). Bursting pressures were similar between the 2 groups: 470 +/- 71 mm Hg for FCD versus 453 +/- 94 mm Hg for traditional closure ( P = .76). The FCD resulted in a faster fascial closure with similar accuracy and strength when compared with traditional open techniques. The potential reduction in serious needle-stick injuries warrants prospective trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2008) conducted an RCT in Abdominal fascial closure after midline laparotomy (n=10). SuturTek 360 degrees Fascial Closure Device (FCD) vs. Traditional suture closure was evaluated on Time to close fascia (p=.012). The SuturTek Fascial Closure Device resulted in a faster fascial closure time compared with traditional closure (5.9 vs 7.7 minutes, P=0.012) with similar accuracy and bursting pressures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: