Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Persistent human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) infection is associated with the development of more than 50% of cervical cancers. The HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins are constitutively expressed in cervical carcinomas and are attractive targets for cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)-based immunotherapy. However, cervical carcinomas may possess multiple evasion mechanisms for HPV16 E6/E7-specific CTL. In this study, we investigated whether HPV16(+) cervical carcinoma cell lines (CaCxCL) could evade all effector functions of HPV16 E6(29-38)-specific T cells. Such CD8(+) T cells were detected in the blood (4/10) or invaded lymph node (1/1) of cervical cancer patients using HLA-A*0201/HPV16 E6(29-38) tetramers after in vitro stimulation. T cells cultured from 3 different donors killed HPV16 E6(29-38) peptide-pulsed target cells but not HPV16(+) CaCxCL in (51)Cr release assays. The absence of killing correlated with limited T-cell degranulation against CaCxCL, but this was not due to antigen processing defects per se; CaCxCL could induce specific T-cell release of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha, and CaCxCL could be killed in longer cytotoxicity assays (>20 hr). Interestingly, the 'slow' killing of CaCxCL could be partially inhibited by concanamycin A, a known perforin inhibitor. The results suggest that CaCxCL was only partially activating T cells, but this was still sufficient for slow killing. Overall, our results highlight the need to examine multiple T-cell effector functions in the context of endogenous antigen presentation by tumour cells. In this study, testing for cytotoxicity using short-term assays only would have ruled out a candidate epitope for immunotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: