Key result
Central BP assessment may predict CV risk better than brachial BP despite lacking randomized data.
Why the study?
Antihypertensive treatment based on brachial BP reduces cardiovascular risk but does not fully reverse hypertension-induced morbidity risk, and central aortic BP may better predict cardiovascular diseases.
Does antihypertensive treatment guided by central aortic pressure improve cardiovascular risk reduction compared to peripheral blood pressure in patients with hypertension?
Does antihypertensive treatment guided by central aortic pressure improve cardiovascular risk reduction compared to peripheral blood pressure in patients with hypertension?
Basing antihypertensive treatment guidance on central pressures rather than peripheral blood pressure may offer individualized assessment and better cardiovascular risk reduction, though direct RCT evidence is currently lacking.
Central BP assessment may better capture residual risk than brachial values; leaves open whether targeting it improves outcomes.
Reduction strategies of blood pressure, as a modifiable cardiovascular risk, are currently based on office assessment of brachial artery blood pressure. However, antihypertensive treatment based on brachial BP values reduces cardiovascular risk but cannot completely reverse the hypertension-induced risk of morbidity events. As is well known, BP varies in different arterial systems and invasive and non-invasive studies have demonstrated that brachial BP does not necessarily reflect central aortic BP. Emerging evidences now suggest that central pressure may predict cardiovascular diseases better than brachial BP; moreover, it may differently respond to certain antihypertensive drugs. The potential effects beyond peripheral BP control may be due to specific protective properties of different antihypertensive drugs in affecting central aortic pressure and arterial stiffness. Although data on direct cardiovascular benefit impact of central blood pressure treatment in randomized clinical trials are still lacking, it is likely that the improvement of quality of care and the individualized assessment of the hypertension-associated cardiovascular risk are achievable with the use of central hemodynamics. Therefore, basing antihypertensive treatment guidance on central pressures rather than on peripheral blood pressure may be the key for future antihypertensive strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rinaldi et al. (2014) conducted a review in Hypertension. Central blood pressure assessment vs. Brachial blood pressure assessment was evaluated. Central blood pressure assessment may predict cardiovascular risk better than brachial blood pressure and could guide future antihypertensive strategies, though randomized trial data are lacking.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: