Key result
Bridge sensors with rectangular cavities yield ~84% higher sensitivity for measuring catheter contact force.
Why the study?
Accurate measurement of catheter tip contact force during cardiac ablation is critical for procedural success, motivating the design of improved MEMS-based force sensors.
A novel MEMS-based force sensor with a rectangular cavity design demonstrates significantly higher sensitivity for measuring catheter contact forces during cardiac ablation.
May enhance ablation catheter force sensing; animal data leaves clinical translation open.
A contact force sensor is a critical clinical unit while performing cardiac ablation procedures. The success rate of these procedures is determined by the effective contact between the tip and the heart tissues. Using a miniaturized, susceptible tri-axial force sensor in the cardiac ablation catheter is quintessential to determine the force acting on the tip accurately. This paper discusses the design, fabrication, and comparison of two MEMS-based force sensors that can potentially be integrated with the catheter tip for better sensitivity. The working principle, shape (ring-type), and outer dimensions of both the sensors are similar, with a strategically positioned narrow rectangular cavity in the second sensor. Finite element analysis is performed to validate the performances of both sensors with the experimental results. The experiments show that sensor 2 (with the rectangular cavity on bridges) has~ 1.84×higher sensitivity than sensor 1 (bridges with no rectangular cavity). The results demonstrate the possibility of integrating the sensor with the catheter tip for measuring catheter contact force.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sitaramgupta et al. (2022) studied Cardiac ablation procedures. Sensor 2 (with rectangular cavity on bridges) vs. Sensor 1 (bridges with no rectangular cavity) was evaluated on Sensitivity (~1.84x higher sensitivity). Sensor 2 (with a rectangular cavity on bridges) demonstrated ~1.84 times higher sensitivity than sensor 1 for measuring catheter contact force.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from IEEE Sensors Journal