Key result
Lipoprotein proteome panel improves classification of CAD and MI compared to controls.
Why the study?
The cell-based measure of cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is complex and low-throughput, motivating development of a high-throughput proteomic method for CEC prediction and coronary artery disease risk assessment.
Does a lipoprotein proteome panel accurately predict cholesterol efflux capacity and coronary artery disease compared to traditional cell-based assays?
Case-Control (n=473)
Does a lipoprotein proteome panel accurately predict cholesterol efflux capacity and coronary artery disease compared to traditional cell-based assays?
A novel high-throughput proteomic panel accurately predicts cholesterol efflux capacity and improves stratification of patients with coronary artery disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid CAD/MI classification in case-control data; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is a measure of HDL function that, in cell-based studies, has demonstrated an inverse association with cardiovascular disease. The cell-based measure of CEC is complex and low-throughput. We hypothesized that assessment of the lipoprotein proteome would allow for precise, high-throughput CEC prediction. METHODS After isolating lipoprotein particles from serum, we used LC-MS/MS to quantify 21 lipoprotein-associated proteins. A bioinformatic pipeline was used to identify proteins with univariate correlation to cell-based CEC measurements and generate a multivariate algorithm for CEC prediction (pCE). Using logistic regression, protein coefficients in the pCE model were reweighted to yield a new algorithm predicting coronary artery disease (pCAD). RESULTS Discovery using targeted LC-MS/MS analysis of 105 training and test samples yielded a pCE model comprising 5 proteins (Spearman r = 0.86). Evaluation of pCE in a case–control study of 231 specimens from healthy individuals and patients with coronary artery disease revealed lower pCE in cases (P = 0.03). Derived within this same study, the pCAD model significantly improved classification (P < 0.0001). Following analytical validation of the multiplexed proteomic method, we conducted a case–control study of myocardial infarction in 137 postmenopausal women that confirmed significant separation of specimen cohorts in both the pCE (P = 0.015) and pCAD (P = 0.001) models. CONCLUSIONS Development of a proteomic pCE provides a reproducible high-throughput alternative to traditional cell-based CEC assays. The pCAD model improves stratification of case and control cohorts and, with further studies to establish clinical validity, presents a new opportunity for the assessment of cardiovascular health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2018) conducted a case-control in Coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction (n=473). Lipoprotein proteome panel (pCE and pCAD models) vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Classification of coronary artery disease (p=<0.0001). A lipoprotein proteome panel (pCAD) significantly improved the classification of patients with coronary artery disease (P<0.0001) and myocardial infarction (P=0.001) compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: