Key result
Left atrial area on routine chest CT is ~39% larger in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Quantitative biomarkers from routine chest CT may facilitate incidental detection of atrial fibrillation, but the relationship between AFib and left atrial enlargement on CT was not well characterized.
Does left atrial enlargement measured on routine nongated chest CT predict the presence of atrial fibrillation?
Cross-Sectional (n=500)
Does left atrial enlargement measured on routine nongated chest CT predict the presence of atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Left atrial measurements from routine nongated chest CTs can serve as specific opportunistic indicators for identifying patients at increased risk for atrial fibrillation.
PURPOSE: Quantitative biomarkers from chest computed tomography (CT) can facilitate the incidental detection of important diseases. Atrial fibrillation (AFib) substantially increases the risk for comorbid conditions including stroke. This study investigated the relationship between AFib status and left atrial enlargement (LAE) on CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 500 consecutive patients who had undergone nongated chest CTs were included, and left atrium maximal axial cross-sectional area (LA-MACSA), left atrium anterior-posterior dimension (LA-AP), and vertebral body cross-sectional area (VB-Area) were measured. Height, weight, age, sex, and diagnosis of AFib were obtained from the medical record. Parametric statistical analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves were performed. Machine learning classifiers were run with clinical risk factors and LA measurements to predict patients with AFib. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients with a diagnosis of AFib were identified. Mean LA-MACSA and LA-AP were significantly larger in patients with AFib than in patients without AFib (28.63 vs. 20.53 cm 2 , P <0.000001; 4.34 vs. 3.5 cm, P <0.000001, respectively), both with area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.73. Multivariable logistic regression analysis including age, sex, and VB-Area with LA-MACSA improved the AUC for predicting AFib (AUC=0.77). An LA-MACSA threshold of 30 cm 2 demonstrated high specificity for AFib diagnosis at 92% and sensitivity of 48%, and LA-AP threshold at 4.5 cm demonstrated 90% specificity and 42% sensitivity. A Bayesian machine learning model using age, sex, height, body surface area, and LA-MACSA predicted AFib with an AUC of 0.743. CONCLUSIONS: LA-MACSA or LA-AP can be rapidly measured from routine chest CT, and when >30 cm 2 and >4.5 cm, respectively, are specific indicators to predict patients at increased risk for AFib.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parker et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=500). Atrial fibrillation vs. No atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Mean left atrium maximal axial cross-sectional area (LA-MACSA) (AUC 0.73, p=<0.000001). Mean left atrial maximal axial cross-sectional area on routine chest CT was significantly larger in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those without (28.63 vs. 20.53 cm2, P<0.000001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: