Key result
Aortic pulse pressure is linked to ~51% higher risk of BNP elevation per 10mmHg in hypertension.
Why the study?
The underlying mechanism linking heart and kidney damage in cardiorenal syndrome remains undetermined, with a hypothesis that central haemodynamic alterations are involved.
Does central pulse pressure link microalbuminuria with plasma B-type natriuretic peptide elevation in patients with hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=386)
Does central pulse pressure link microalbuminuria with plasma B-type natriuretic peptide elevation in patients with hypertension?
Odds Ratio: 1.51
p-value: p=0.001
Concomitant plasma BNP elevation and microalbuminuria in hypertensive patients can be explained by increases in aortic pulse pressure and pulse wave velocity, suggesting altered central hemodynamics cause simultaneous cardiorenal damage.
Central hemodynamics may underlie concurrent cardiorenal markers in hypertension; leaves open whether targeting aortic pulse pressure improves outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: A pathological connection between the heart and kidney is well recognized as a cardiorenal syndrome, but the underlying mechanism remains undetermined. We hypothesized that this connection is attributable to central haemodynamic alterations. METHODS: In 386 patients with hypertension, the radial, carotid and femoral pressure waveforms were recorded with applanation tonometry to estimate the aortic pressure and pulse wave velocity (PWV). The plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), cardiac and renal damage biomarkers, respectively, were also measured for each patient. RESULTS: The BNP was correlated positively with UACR, aortic pulse pressure and PWV, but inversely with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, P < 0.001). The aortic pulse pressure tended to more closely correlate with BNP than the brachial pulse pressure. The presence of (micro)albuminuria (UACR ≥30 mg/g) was associated with BNP elevation (≥50 pg/ml) independently of age, BMI, mean arterial pressure, eGFR and β-blocker treatment (odds ratio: 2.41; P = 0.04). However, further adjustment for the aortic pulse pressure or PWV rendered this albuminuria-BNP relationship insignificant (P = 0.25) and, instead, the aortic pulse pressure emerged as the strongest determinant of BNP elevation (odds ratio: 1.51 per 10mmHg; P = 0.001). Differently from albuminuria, lower eGFR was consistently related to higher plasma BNP, even after controlling for the aortic pressure and PWV. CONCLUSION: Concomitant plasma BNP elevation with (micro)albuminuria can be explained by increases in aortic pulse pressure and PWV. This finding suggests that the altered central haemodynamics causes simultaneous damage/dysfunction in the heart and kidney, which could then contribute to cardiorenal syndrome in hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashimoto et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=386). Aortic pulse pressure was evaluated on BNP elevation (≥50 pg/ml) (OR 1.51 per 10mmHg, p=0.001). Aortic pulse pressure was the strongest determinant of BNP elevation in hypertensive patients (OR 1.51 per 10mmHg; P=0.001), explaining the association between microalbuminuria and BNP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: