Key result
Combining CAD-RADS and CACS outperforms individual methods predicting functional ischemia in NAFLD with AUC ~0.82.
Why the study?
Differences between patients with coronary artery stenosis with and without NAFLD and predictors of functional coronary artery ischemia in NAFLD patients were unclear.
Does the combined use of CAD-RADS and CACS classifications predict functional coronary artery ischemia in patients with NAFLD?
Observational (n=392)
Does the combined use of CAD-RADS and CACS classifications predict functional coronary artery ischemia in patients with NAFLD?
The combination of CAD-RADS and CACS classifications can effectively predict functional coronary artery ischemia in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
May support ischemia prediction in NAFLD; hypothesis-generating from cross-sectional data and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a chronic liver disease associated with metabolic syndrome. It is the most common cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis. The disease is also involved in the occurrence and development of type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis and can directly affect the outcome of patients with coronary heart disease. Therefore, the focus of treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease has also begun to focus on the treatment of risk factors for atherosclerotic heart disease. In this study, we investigated the difference between patients with coronary artery stenosis combined with NAFLD and those without NAFLD and evaluated the predictive factors and value of functional coronary artery ischemia in patients with NAFLD. HYPOTHESIS: Many clinical factors (such as age, BMI, hyperglycemia) and imaging parameters (such as CACS grade) in the NAFLD group were different from those in the non-NAFLD group. The predictive model combined with multiple influencing factors has a good value in predicting coronary artery ischemia in patients with NAFLD. METHODS: We collected the clinical and imaging data of patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography and coronary artery calcification score (CACS) scans between January and June 2023. A total of 392 patients were included and divided into the NAFLD group and the non-NAFLD group. Based on CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), patients with NAFLD were divided into CT-FFR ≤ 0.08 group and CT-FFR > 0.08 group. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the non-NAFLD and NAFLD groups in terms of age, body mass index, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein, coronary artery disease-reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) classification, CACS classification, number of diseased coronary arteries, and CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 ratio (p < .05). The CAD-RADS and CACS classifications can independently predict functional coronary artery ischemia in NAFLD patients. The combined use of CAD-RADS and CACS classifications resulted in an area under the curve of 0.819 (95% confidence interval: 0.761-0.876) for predicting coronary artery ischemia in NAFLD patients, which was higher than the individual classification methods (CAD-RADS: 0.762, CACS: 0.742) (p = .000). CONCLUSIONS: There are differences between patients with coronary artery stenosis and NAFLD and those without NAFLD. The CAD-RADS classification and CACS classification can economically and efficiently predict functional coronary artery ischemia in patients with NAFLD, which has crucial value in clinical diagnosis and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and coronary artery ischemia (n=392). Combined CAD-RADS and CACS classifications vs. Individual classification methods was evaluated on Functional coronary artery ischemia (CT-FFR ≤ 0.80) (AUC 0.819, 95% CI 0.761-0.876, p=.000). Combined CAD-RADS and CACS classifications predicted functional coronary artery ischemia in NAFLD patients with an AUC of 0.819 (95% CI 0.761-0.876; p=0.000), outperforming individual methods.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: