Key result
A 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose reduces nonresponsiveness ~71% versus 300-mg during coronary stenting.
Why the study?
Limited information is available on the comparative effect of a 600-mg versus a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose on nonresponsiveness and high post-treatment platelet aggregation in patients undergoing coronary stenting.
Does a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose reduce nonresponsiveness and high post-treatment platelet aggregation compared to a 300-mg dose in patients undergoing coronary stenting?
Population
190 patients undergoing coronary stenting
Comparison
600-mg clopidogrel loading dose vs 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose
Design
Randomized treatment allocation
Authors
Loading...
A 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose significantly reduces the incidence of nonresponsiveness and high post-treatment platelet aggregation compared to a standard 300-mg dose in patients undergoing coronary stenting.
RCT (n=190)
Does a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose reduce nonresponsiveness and high post-treatment platelet aggregation compared to a 300-mg dose in patients undergoing coronary stenting?
Absolute Event Rate: 8% vs 28%
p-value: p=<0.001
A 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose significantly reduces the incidence of nonresponsiveness and high post-treatment platelet aggregation compared to a standard 300-mg dose in patients undergoing coronary stenting.
Gurbel et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Coronary stenting (n=190). Clopidogrel vs. 300-mg loading dose was evaluated on Nonresponsiveness (<10% absolute change in platelet aggregation) with 5 microM ADP (p=<0.001). A 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose reduced the incidence of nonresponsiveness compared to a 300-mg dose (8% vs. 28% with 5 microM ADP, p<0.001) in patients undergoing coronary stenting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: