Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the pursuit of low-carbon cement technologies, both limestone calcined clay cement (LC 3 ) and CO₂ curing have shown great promise for reducing emissions in the construction industry. This study investigates the synergistic effects of CO₂ curing and ambient humidity on the mechanical performance and microstructure of LC 3 . Cylindrical LC 3 specimens were prepared using a low water-to-binder ratio and compaction molding, followed by 3-hour CO₂ curing under different relative humidity conditions (50 %, 70 %, and 95 %) and subsequent conventional curing. The results reveal that CO₂ curing significantly enhances the strength and densification of LC 3 . At an optimal cement replacement level of 30 %, compressive strength at 28 days increased by up to 18.8 % under high-humidity carbonation (95 %) compared to non-carbonated reference samples. At 90 days, the strength reached 87.3 MPa. High humidity during carbonation facilitated the formation of calcium carbonate and C-S-H gels, leading to a denser microstructure with reduced porosity and crack formation. These findings demonstrate that combining LC 3 with humidity-optimized CO₂ curing offers a robust pathway toward high-performance, low-carbon cementitious materials, with clear implications for sustainable construction practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: