Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study develops an ordinary Portland cement (OPC)-free, 3D-printable loess-based material through an integrated formulation–process–performance approach. Thirteen modified mixtures (M1–M13) were designed using a multi-component calcium-bearing binder, graded aggregates, biopolymer modifiers, and treated straw fibers. Fresh-state performance was assessed through flow-table measurements, comparative rotational viscometry, and direct buildability tests, while mechanical properties were evaluated through compressive testing. Complementary SEM–EDS, XRD, XRF, TG/DTG, and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) analyses were conducted to characterize the traditional control (TRA) and optimized mixture M13. Among the thirteen modified formulations, M13 achieved the highest mean 14-day compressive strength of 1.064 ± 0.064 MPa. It also exhibited the highest buildability among the four directly tested formulations, sustaining 7.67 ± 0.58 stable layers. MIP revealed lower mercury-accessible porosity in M13 (32.30%) than in TRA (38.56%), indicating a refined accessible pore-throat structure. In the preliminary 28-day printing validation, the recorded compressive strength of printed M13 was approximately 3.9% lower than that of its cast counterpart, while the printed element exhibited a 2.5% height reduction relative to its nominal initial dimension. These findings demonstrate that coordinated formulation design can improve the balance between mechanical performance and layer-stacking capacity. The study provides a process-oriented experimental framework for developing OPC-free printable earthen materials, while further durability and interface-performance assessments remain necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: