Key result
Higher training years, lectures, and surgical volume are linked to better anatomy knowledge among O&G trainees.
Why the study?
Limitations in applied anatomy knowledge exist among obstetrics and gynaecology trainees, and factors associated with this knowledge need evaluation.
Cross-Sectional (n=271)
Deficiencies in applied anatomy knowledge exist among O&G trainees, which may be improved by more undergraduate courses, operating sessions, workshops, and senior demonstrations.
May warrant enhanced anatomy curricula for O&G trainees; leaves open impact on clinical performance.
Background Medical education has recognised the importance of anatomy teaching. Limitations in applied anatomy knowledge exist among obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) trainees. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge of O&G trainees in applied anatomy and study-associated factors. Materials and methods The questionnaire-based study involved O&G trainees between 1/8/2019 and 1/12/2019. Data collected included age, gender, evaluation of medical school anatomy course, attendance at applied anatomy workshops, operating theatre workload, and senior colleagues’ demonstration of anatomy during operating sessions. Results There were 271 trainees recruited with a mean age of 29.3 years, and 80.1% rated the value of medical school anatomy courses as average or above average. Furthermore, 90.8% never attended applied anatomy workshops. In addition, 9.6% and 62% of first- and fifth-year trainees rated their knowledge as either good or very good, and 41.7% reported that anatomy demonstrations by senior doctors happened sometimes. The overall score of applied anatomy knowledge was significantly higher in higher training years, with attendance at applied anatomy lectures, with more operating workloads, and when senior doctors demonstrate anatomy more often during operating sessions. Conclusions Deficiencies in knowledge existed. Factors which may improve knowledge include more applied undergraduate anatomy courses, more frequent operating sessions, attending anatomy workshops, and more senior colleagues’ demonstration of anatomy during surgeries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asali et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) trainees (n=271). Training year, anatomy lectures, operating workload, and senior demonstrations was evaluated on Applied anatomy knowledge score. Applied anatomy knowledge among O&G trainees was significantly higher in higher training years, with attendance at applied anatomy lectures, more operating workloads, and frequent senior demonstrations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: