Key result
Perioperative NSAID use shows no link to gastrointestinal anastomotic failure in emergency general surgery.
Why the study?
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration may potentially increase the risk of postoperative gastrointestinal anastomotic failure in emergency general surgery patients.
Does perioperative NSAID utilization increase the risk of gastrointestinal anastomotic failure in emergency general surgery patients undergoing gastrointestinal resection and anastomosis?
Cohort (n=533)
Yes
Does perioperative NSAID utilization increase the risk of gastrointestinal anastomotic failure in emergency general surgery patients undergoing gastrointestinal resection and anastomosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 13.9% vs 10.7%
p-value: p=0.26
Perioperative NSAID use appears safe in emergency general surgery patients undergoing small-bowel resection but should be used cautiously in those with colon or rectal anastomoses due to a potentially increased risk of anastomotic failure.
No increased anastomotic failure risk seen with perioperative NSAIDs; leaves open need for randomized confirmation in emergency general surgery.
BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used analgesic and anti-inflammatory adjuncts. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration may potentially increase the risk of postoperative gastrointestinal anastomotic failure (AF). We aim to determine if perioperative NSAID utilization influences gastrointestinal AF in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients undergoing gastrointestinal resection and anastomosis. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of a multi-institutional prospectively collected database was performed. Anastomotic failure was defined as the occurrence of a dehiscence/leak, fistula, or abscess. Patients using NSAIDs were compared with those without. Summary, univariate, and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria with a mean (±SD) age of 60 ± 17.5 years, 53% men. Forty-six percent (n = 244) of the patients were using perioperative NSAIDs. Gastrointestinal AF rate between NSAID and no NSAID was 13.9% versus 10.7% (p = 0.26). No differences existed between groups with respect to perioperative steroid use (16.8% vs. 13.8%; p = 0.34) or mortality (7.39% vs. 6.92%, p = 0.84). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that perioperative corticosteroid (odds ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-4.81) use and the presence of a colocolonic or colorectal anastomoses were independently associated with AF. A subset analysis of the NSAIDs cohort demonstrated an increased AF rate in colocolonic or colorectal anastomosis compared with enteroenteric or enterocolonic anastomoses (30.0% vs. 13.0%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Perioperative NSAID utilization appears to be safe in EGS patients undergoing small-bowel resection and anastomosis. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration should be used cautiously in EGS patients with colon or rectal anastomoses. Future randomized trials should validate the effects of perioperative NSAIDs use on AF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level III.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haddad et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Emergency general surgery requiring gastrointestinal resection and anastomosis (n=533). Perioperative NSAID utilization vs. No perioperative NSAID utilization was evaluated on Gastrointestinal anastomotic failure (dehiscence/leak, fistula, or abscess) (p=0.26). Perioperative NSAID utilization in emergency general surgery patients was not significantly associated with gastrointestinal anastomotic failure compared to no NSAID use (13.9% vs 10.7%; p=0.26).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: