Key result
Dobutamine challenge recruits inner-layer myofiber shortening and thickening in subendocardial but not transmural infarcts.
Why the study?
The relation between segmental left ventricular function and the transmural extent of myocardial necrosis is complex and crucial for diagnosing myocardial viability with inotropic stimulation.
Does dobutamine stimulation reveal contractile reserve in subendocardial versus transmural experimental infarcts in dogs?
Comparison
Dobutamine stimulation (5 µg/kg/min) vs rest
Design
Experimental preclinical study with tagged magnetic resonance imaging
Follow-up
2 days post-infarction
Authors
Loading...
Supports experimental viability assessment by infarct layer; leaves open translation to human contractile reserve testing.
Does dobutamine stimulation reveal contractile reserve in subendocardial versus transmural experimental infarcts in dogs?
p-value: p=<0.01
Dobutamine stimulation recruits myofiber shortening and thickening in inner layers of subendocardial infarcts but not transmural infarcts, which may aid in detecting myocardial viability.
Garot et al. (2000) studied Reperfused myocardial infarction (n=7). Dobutamine stimulation vs. Rest was evaluated on Circumferential shortening (Ecc) and radial thickening (Err) (p=<0.01). Under dobutamine challenge, recruitment of myofiber shortening and thickening was observed in inner layers of segments with subendocardial infarcts, but not in transmural infarcts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: