Why the study?
Inadequate pharmacologic stress may limit the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging, and the splenic ratio has emerged as a potential imaging biomarker for stress adequacy.
Is high AI-derived splenic ratio associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing regadenoson stress PET MPI?
Population
16,650 patients from six sites in the REFINE PET registry undergoing 82Rb-PET MPI with regadenoson stress
Comparison
High AI-derived splenic ratio vs lower splenic ratio stratified by decile groups
Design
Retrospective multicentre cohort study using fully automated AI algorithms
Follow-up
Median 3.4 years
Key result
High AI-derived splenic ratio was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.06-1.34; P=0.005).
Authors
Loading...
High splenic ratio was associated with elevated MACE risk independent of ischemia; hypothesis-generating for incremental PET risk stratification beyond standard metrics.
Cohort (n=16,650)
Yes
Is high AI-derived splenic ratio associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing regadenoson stress PET MPI?
Hazard Ratio: 1.19 (95% CI 1.06–1.34)
p-value: p=0.005
Elevated AI-derived splenic ratio during regadenoson stress PET MPI is an independent prognostic biomarker for MACE, providing risk stratification even in patients with preserved myocardial flow reserve and no ischemia.
Recent publication with media coverage on spleen's role in CAD; high expert commentary at ESC.
Ramirez et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Clinically indicated myocardial perfusion imaging (n=16,650). High splenic ratio (SR) vs. Lower splenic ratio was evaluated on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.34, p=0.005). High AI-derived splenic ratio was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.06-1.34; P=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: