Key result
The modified conventional DNA extraction method successfully yielded amplifiable African swine fever virus DNA from formalin-fixed tissues, whereas three commercial extraction kits failed to do so.
Why the study?
Extraction and analysis of genomic material from formalin fixed tissue remains a challenge despite numerous attempts to develop more effective methods for ASFV detection.
A modified conventional DNA extraction method is superior to commercial kits for extracting African swine fever virus DNA from formalin-fixed tissues for PCR detection.
Aim: Formalin fixing and paraffin embedding of tissue samples is one of the techniques for preserving the structural integrity of cells for a very long time.However, extraction and analysis of genomic material from formalin fixed tissue (FFT) remains a challenge despite numerous attempts to develop a more effective method.The success of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) depends on the quality of DNA extract. Materials and Methods:Here we assessed the conventional method of DNA extraction from FFT for African swine fever virus (ASFV) detection.The modified conventional method gave a higher quality DNA when compared with commercially available DNA extraction kits (QIAamp ® DNA Mini Kit, DNeasy ® Blood and Tissue Kit, and ZR Genomic DNA ™ Tissue MiniPrep).Results: An average A260/A280 DNA purity of 0.86-1.68 and 3.22-5.32μg DNA/mg for formalin fixed and non-fixed tissues, respectively using a conventional method.In a reproducible and three times repeat PCR, the ASFV DNA expected product size of 278 bp was obtained from the DNA extract of the conventional method but not from the DNA extract of the commercial kits. Conclusion:The present study has demonstrated that the conventional method extracts ASFV genome better than commercial kit.In summary, the commercial kit extraction appeared not suitable to purify ASFV DNA from FFT. We, therefore, recommend that the use of the conventional method be considered for African swine fever DNA extraction from FFT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luka et al. (2014) studied African swine fever virus (n=28). Modified conventional DNA extraction method vs. Commercial DNA extraction kits was evaluated on Amplification of 278 bp ASFV DNA product by PCR. The modified conventional DNA extraction method successfully yielded amplifiable African swine fever virus DNA from formalin-fixed tissues, whereas three commercial extraction kits failed to do so.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: