Key result
Qualitative analysis of 1,000 veterans' EHRs revealed that VA-financed non-VA care creates substantial care coordination challenges, hidden work for patients, and strains the VA system.
Why the study?
Little is known about the implications for the VA system of recent increases in VA-financed non-VA care among US veterans with advanced kidney disease.
Observational (n=1,000)
VA-financed non-VA care for veterans with advanced kidney disease creates substantial care coordination challenges and strains the VA system, staff, and patients.
Importance: Since 2014, when Congress passed the Veterans Access Choice and Accountability (Choice) Act (replaced in 2018 with the more comprehensive Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks [MISSION] Act), the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been paying for US veterans to receive increasing amounts of care in the private sector (non-VA care or VA community care). However, little is known about the implications of these legislative changes for the VA system. Objective: To describe the implications for the VA system of recent increases in VA-financed non-VA care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study was a thematic analysis of documentation in the electronic health records (EHRs) of a random sample of US veterans with advanced kidney disease between June 6, 2019, and February 5, 2021. Exposures: Mentions of community care in participant EHRs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dominant themes pertaining to VA-financed non-VA care. Results: Among 1000 study participants, the mean (SD) age was 73.8 (11.4) years, and 957 participants (95.7%) were male. Three interrelated themes pertaining to VA-financed non-VA care emerged from qualitative analysis of documentation in cohort member EHRs: (1) VA as mothership, which describes extensive care coordination by VA staff members and clinicians to facilitate care outside the VA and the tendency of veterans and their non-VA clinicians to rely on the VA to fill gaps in this care; (2) hidden work of veterans, which describes the efforts of veterans and their family members to navigate the referral process, and to serve as intermediaries between VA and non-VA clinicians; and (3) strain on the VA system, which describes a challenging referral process and the ways in which cross-system care has stretched the traditional roles of VA staff and clinicians and interfered with VA care processes. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this qualitative study describing VA-financed non-VA care for veterans with advanced kidney disease spotlight the substantial challenges of cross-system use and the strain placed on the VA system, VA staff and clinicians, and veterans and their families in recent years. These difficult-to-measure consequences of cross-system care should be considered when budgeting, evaluating, and planning the provision of VA-financed non-VA care in the private sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Hare et al. (2022) conducted an observational in advanced kidney disease (n=1,000). VA-financed non-VA care was evaluated on Dominant themes pertaining to VA-financed non-VA care. Qualitative analysis of 1,000 veterans' EHRs revealed that VA-financed non-VA care creates substantial care coordination challenges, hidden work for patients, and strains the VA system.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: