Key result
IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism linked to ~8% higher prostate cancer risk.
Why the study?
There was controversy regarding the association between the IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism and prostate cancer risk due to varied outcomes in previous studies.
Is the IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer?
Meta-Analysis (n=17,979)
Is the IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer?
Odds Ratio: 1.08 (95% CI 1.01–1.16)
The IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism is associated with a marginally increased risk of prostate cancer.
IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism may confer marginal prostate cancer risk; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before any clinical consideration.
Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP3) has been identified as a putative tumor suppressor with multifunctional roles in the IGF axis. Recently, there have been a growing body of studies investigating the relation between the IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism, circulating IGFBP3 and prostate cancer risk, but their outcomes varied leading to controversy. Hence, it is necessary to perform a meta-analysis covering all eligible studies to shed a light on the association of IGFBP3 A-202C and cancer risk. Finally, we included a total of 11 relevant articles between 2003 and 2010 covering 14 case-control studies including 9,238 cases and 8,741 controls for our analysis. Our results showed that A-202C was a marginal risk factor of prostate cancer (allele contrast: OR=1.08, 95% CI :1.01-1.16; dominant model: OR=1.11, 95% CI :1.01-1.22; heterozygote codominant model: OR=1.11, 95% CI :1.03-1.18; homozygote contrast: OR=1.19, 95% CI :1.03-1.37). Stratification analysis revealed that sample size and control source were two major heterogeneous meta-factors especially in the recessive model (source: Population-based control group :p=0.30,I2=16.7%, Hospital-based control group: p=0.20, I2=30.3%; sample size: Small: p=0.22,I2= 32.8%, Medium: p=0.09,I2= 48%, Large p=0.60,I2=0.0%); However, contrary to previous findings, no significance was found in racial subgroups. No significant publication bias was found in our analysis. Considering the robustness of the results and the discrepancy among some studies, there might be some unsolved confounding factors, and further more critical large studies are needed for confirmation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis in Prostate cancer (n=17,979). IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism vs. Reference genotype was evaluated on Prostate cancer risk (allele contrast) (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16). The IGFBP3 A-202C polymorphism was associated with a marginally increased risk of prostate cancer (allele contrast OR 1.08).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: