Key result
Hemodialysis patients exhibit lower GLS and GWE than healthy controls both before and after dialysis.
Why the study?
The value of left ventricular pressure-strain loop (LV-PSL) for assessing myocardial work in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis was not established.
Does hemodialysis alter left ventricular myocardial work parameters assessed by LV-PSL in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Observational (n=167)
Does hemodialysis alter left ventricular myocardial work parameters assessed by LV-PSL in patients with chronic kidney disease?
p-value: p=0.006
Noninvasive left ventricular pressure-strain loop parameters can effectively evaluate acute changes in myocardial work and volume load during hemodialysis.
Myocardial work indices may track acute hemodialysis effects on LV function in CKD; leaves open their prognostic or therapeutic utility.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of a novel echocardiographic measure-left ventricular pressure-strain loop (LV-PSL) for assessment of patients with chronic kidney disease by comparing the changes before and after hemodialysis (HD). METHODS: A total of 117 patients undergoing regular hemodialysis were recruited. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) combined with cuff blood pressure measurement is used to calculate the global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE). The differences in echocardiographic parameters before and after hemodialysis on the same day were compared. Additionally, 50 healthy individuals were included as the control group. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, both the pre-HD and post-HD groups exhibited significantly lower GLS and GWE (pre-HD: p = 0.006 and p = 0.000, respectively; post-HD: p = 0.000 and p = 0.000, respectively). In contrast, the pre-HD group had significantly higher values in PSD, GWI, GCW, and GWW (p = 0.000 for PSD and GWW; p = 0.001 for GWI and GCW). Notably, the post-HD group also had higher values in PSD and GWW compared to the control group (p = 0.000 for both), while no significant differences were observed in GWI and GCW between the post-HD and control groups (p = 0.247 and p = 0.134, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The LV-PSL parameters are capable of effectively assessing myocardial work in HD patients. Moreover, these parameters offer novel reference indicators for evaluating volume load and left ventricular myocardial function in HD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miao et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Chronic kidney disease (n=167). Hemodialysis vs. Healthy individuals was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global work efficiency (GWE) (p=0.006). Hemodialysis patients exhibited significantly lower global longitudinal strain and global work efficiency compared to healthy controls both before (p=0.006 and p=0.000) and after hemodialysis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: