Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 11, 2017ESC Heart FailureOpen Access

Global Longitudinal Strain Corrected by RR Interval is a Superior Predictor of All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Systolic Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Decreasing RR-corrected GLS is linked to ~16% higher mortality in HFrEF patients with AF.

  • HR 1.16
  • 95% CI 1.02-1.22
  • P=0.014
  • n=151

Why the study?

Quantification of systolic function in patients with atrial fibrillation is challenging and the superiority of RR interval-corrected global longitudinal strain in HFrEF patients with AF was unknown.

Does RR interval-corrected global longitudinal strain (GLSc) improve prediction of all-cause mortality compared to uncorrected GLS or LVEF in patients with HFrEF and atrial fibrillation?

Population

151 HFrEF patients with AF during echocardiographic examination

Comparison

RR interval-corrected GLS vs uncorrected GLS and LVEF

Design

Cohort study

Follow-up

Median 2.7 years

Authors

Daniel Modin
Daniel ModinHeart Failure / Cardiomyopathy
MSMorten SengeløvCardiac ImagingPJPeter Godsk JørgensenCardiac Imaging

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

GLSc may refine mortality risk stratification in HFrEF with AF; leaves open its clinical adoption pending prospective validation.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=151)

Structured PICO

Does RR interval-corrected global longitudinal strain (GLSc) improve prediction of all-cause mortality compared to uncorrected GLS or LVEF in patients with HFrEF and atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
151 patients with systolic heart failure and atrial fibrillation during echocardiographic examination, followed for a median of 2.7 years.
E
Exposure
RR interval-corrected peak global longitudinal strain (GLSc = GLS/[RR^(1/2)])
C
Comparator
Uncorrected global longitudinal strain (GLS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
O
Outcome
All-cause mortalityhard clinical

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 1.16 (95% CI 1.02–1.22)

p-value: p=0.014

RR interval-corrected global longitudinal strain (GLSc) is superior to uncorrected GLS and LVEF for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF and atrial fibrillation.

Cite This Study

Modin et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Systolic heart failure and atrial fibrillation (n=151). RR interval-corrected peak global longitudinal strain (GLSc) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.22, p=0.014). Decreasing RR interval-corrected global longitudinal strain was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients with AF (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.02-1.22; P=0.014).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6ab092bbf1d612af1803be20https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12220
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Global left ventricular longitudinal systolic strain as a major predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation2013 · 50 citations
  2. 2Prediction of All-Cause Mortality and Heart Failure Admissions From Global Left Ventricular Longitudinal Strain in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction2013 · 407 citations
  3. 3Optimal number of beats for the Doppler measurement of cardiac output in atrial fibrillation1997 · 71 citations
  4. 4Role of Echocardiography in Atrial Fibrillation2011 · 47 citations
  5. 5Current Status of 3-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: A Review from Our Experiences2014 · 63 citations