Key result
Simple model accurately predicts airborne foot-and-mouth disease risk using known source and herd data.
Why the study?
Airborne transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus is the most difficult to control and requires accurate prediction tools for infection risk to flocks or herds.
A simple model can reliably estimate the risk of airborne foot-and-mouth disease infection to prioritize surveillance, highlighting the need for accurate livestock databases.
Foot-and-mouth disease is a highly contagious disease of cloven-hoofed animals, the control and eradication of which is of significant worldwide socio-economic importance. The virus may spread by direct contact between animals or via fomites as well as through airborne transmission, with the latter being the most difficult to control. Here, we consider the risk of infection to flocks or herds from airborne virus emitted from a known infected premises. We show that airborne infection can be predicted quickly and with a good degree of accuracy, provided that the source of virus emission has been determined and reliable geo-referenced herd data are available. A simple model provides a reliable tool for estimating risk from known sources and for prioritizing surveillance and detection efforts. The issue of data information management systems was highlighted as a lesson to be learned from the official inquiry into the UK 2007 foot-and-mouth outbreak: results here suggest that the efficacy of disease control measures could be markedly improved through an accurate livestock database incorporating flock/herd size and location, which would enable tactical as well as strategic modelling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schley et al. (2008) studied Foot-and-mouth disease. Airborne virus emission was evaluated on Risk of infection to flocks or herds. Airborne infection risk of foot-and-mouth disease to flocks or herds can be predicted quickly and accurately using a simple model, provided the source is known and reliable herd data are available.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: