Key result
Cardiopulmonary bypass during beating-heart CABG is linked to increased postoperative AF risk.
Why the study?
Risk factors and postoperative outcomes of new-onset atrial fibrillation following beating-heart CABG without aortic cross clamping and cardioplegic arrest were not well defined.
Does the use of cardiopulmonary bypass increase the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing beating-heart CABG?
Observational (n=458)
Does the use of cardiopulmonary bypass increase the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing beating-heart CABG?
p-value: p=≤0.001
Older age and the use of cardiopulmonary bypass are independent predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation following beating-heart CABG, which is associated with prolonged ICU and hospital stays.
CPB use during beating-heart CABG was associated with higher POAF risk; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: To determine the risk factors and postoperative outcomes of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) following beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. METHODS: A total of 458 patients who underwent beating-heart CABG without the use of aortic cross clamping and cardioplegic arrest between January 2011 and January 2015 were included in the study, and they were divided into two groups according to the development of new-onset AF as the AF group (n = 143) and non-AF group (n = 315). Both groups were compared in terms of preoperative clinical features and perioperative data, and the risk factors and postoperative outcomes of AF following beating-heart CABG were determined. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative AF was 31.2%. Patients in the AF group were significantly older (68.08 ± 7.76 vs. 61.76 ± 9.83 years, p ≤ 0.001) and had significantly higher use of cardiopulmonary bypass during surgery (69.2% vs. 43.2%, p ≤ 0.001) than the patients in the non-AF group. The patients with AF also had statistically significantly longer lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stay than those without AF (43.79 ± 32.39 vs. 30.49 ± 33.31 hours, p ≤ 0.001, and 8.20 ± 4.37 vs. 5.77 ± 2.16 days, p ≤ 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that age and the use of cardiopulmonary bypass during surgery were independent predictors of AF following beating-heart CABG. In addition, postoperative AF was associated with prolonged intensive care unit and hospital stay. Further prospective randomized studies with larger patient series are required to support our research and attain more accurate data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velioğlu et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=458). Cardiopulmonary bypass vs. No cardiopulmonary bypass was evaluated on New-onset atrial fibrillation (p=≤0.001). Cardiopulmonary bypass use during beating-heart CABG was an independent predictor of postoperative atrial fibrillation, with higher use in the AF group than the non-AF group (69.2% vs 43.2%, p≤0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: