This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The scintillation properties of RbGd/sub 2/Br/sub 7/ crystals, doped with Ce/sup 3+/ concentrations of 0.02, 0.11, 0.88, 2.05, 4.1, and 9.8%, are studied under X-ray and /spl gamma/-quanta excitations. For the RbGd/sub 2/Br/sub 7/ sample doped with 9.8% Ce, the authors measured a light yield of 56000/spl plusmn/6000 photons per MeV of absorbed /spl gamma/-ray energy with a main decay time of 43/spl plusmn/1 ns, using a Hamamatsu R1791 photomultiplier (PMT), a /sup 137/Cs radioactive source, and a shaping time of 10 /spl mu/s. A time resolution of 790/spl plusmn/10 ps was measured for the RbGd/sub 2/Br/sub 7/:9.8% Ce compound, using BaF/sub 2/ as second scintillator, two XP2020Q PMTs, a /sup 22/Na source, and an energy threshold set at E/spl ges/511 keV. With the R1791 PMT, an energy resolution of 4.1% (FWHM over peak position) for the 662-keV full absorption peak has been observed for two crystals of 7/spl times/4/spl times/2 mm/sup 3/ and 15/spl times/5/spl times/1 mm/sup 3/ with 4.1 and 9.8% Ce content, respectively. Moreover, the nonproportional responses of three RbGd/sub 2/Br/sub 7/:Ce compounds with different concentrations (0.11, 2.05, and 9.8%) were studied revealing an almost-constant light output response from 17.4 keV to 1 MeV. These properties are compared to three other well-known scintillators: NaI:Tl, CsI:Tl, and Lu/sub 2/SiO/sub 5/:Ce.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guillot-Noël et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: