Key result
Automatic wireless remote ICD monitoring cuts inappropriate shocks by ~52% versus standard ambulatory follow-up.
Why the study?
Inappropriate shocks remain a highly challenging complication of implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and the effect of automatic wireless remote monitoring on reducing these shocks was examined.
Does automatic wireless remote monitoring reduce the incidence of inappropriate shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
RCT (n=433)
Does automatic wireless remote monitoring reduce the incidence of inappropriate shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Automatic wireless remote monitoring of ICDs significantly reduces the incidence and total number of inappropriate shocks compared to standard ambulatory follow-up.
RM halves inappropriate ICD shocks (5% vs 10%); reinforces alert-driven follow-up over routine ambulatory care in RCTs.
INTRODUCTION: Inappropriate shocks remain a highly challenging complication of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). We examined whether automatic wireless remote monitoring (RM) of ICD, by providing early notifications of triggering events, lowers the incidence of inappropriate shocks. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 433 patients randomly assigned to RM (n = 221; active group) versus ambulatory follow-up (n = 212; control group). Patients in the active group were seen in the ambulatory department once a year, unless RM reported an event requiring an earlier ambulatory visit. Patients in the control group were seen in the ambulatory department every 6 months. The occurrence of first and further inappropriate shocks, and their causes in each group were compared. The characteristics of the study groups, including pharmaceutical regimens, were similar. Over a follow-up of 27 months, 5.0% of patients in the active group received ≥1 inappropriate shocks versus 10.4% in the control group (P = 0.03). A total of 28 inappropriate shocks were delivered in the active versus 283 in the control group. Shocks were triggered by supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTA) in 48.5%, noise oversensing in 21.2%, T wave oversensing in 15.2%, and lead dysfunction in 15.2% of patients. The numbers of inappropriate shocks delivered per patient, triggered by SVTA and by lead dysfunction, were 74% and 98% lower, respectively, in the active than in the control group. CONCLUSION: RM was highly effective in the long-term prevention of inappropriate ICD shocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guédon-Moreau et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) (n=433). Automatic wireless remote monitoring (RM) vs. Ambulatory follow-up every 6 months was evaluated on Occurrence of ≥1 inappropriate shocks (p=0.03). Automatic wireless remote monitoring of ICDs significantly reduced the incidence of ≥1 inappropriate shocks compared to standard ambulatory follow-up (5.0% vs 10.4%, P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: