Key result
In a cohort of 2,050 remotely monitored ICD patients, inappropriate shocks occurred in 1.6% of patients, most commonly due to supraventricular tachycardia with 1:1 atrioventricular association.
Why the study?
What are the mechanisms and rates of inappropriate defibrillator therapy in remotely monitored patients?
Cohort (n=2,050)
No
What are the mechanisms and rates of inappropriate defibrillator therapy in remotely monitored patients?
In a modern cohort of remotely monitored ICD patients, inappropriate shocks occur at a low rate (1.6%), most commonly driven by SVT with 1:1 AV association.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Remote monitoring linked to low inappropriate shock rates; leaves open prospective evaluation of SVT discrimination programming.
INTRODUCTION: Defibrillator (ICD) technology and monitoring are evolving rapidly. We investigated the mechanisms of inappropriate ICD therapies in a modern cohort of patients followed at our institution via remote monitoring. METHODS: From September 2009 to March 2011, a total of 2,050 ICD patients (19,600 patient-months) were remotely followed. All events (shocks and antitachycardia pacing) were adjudicated by arrhythmia specialists. RESULTS: A total of 249 patients received ICD therapy (34% inappropriate therapy). Inappropriate ICD shocks affected 33 (1.6%) patients. There were a total of 249 inappropriate episodes in 85 patients. Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with 1:1 atrioventricular association was the predominant mechanism accounting for 133 episodes in 50 patients, followed by atrial fibrillation (97 episodes in 27 patients). T-wave oversensing (16 episodes in five patients), electromagnetic interference (two episodes in two patients), and ectopic beats (one episode in one patient) accounted for a small proportion of events. There were 35 arrhythmic episodes in five patients that could not be classified, all in patients with single-chamber devices. There were no differences in these results by device manufacturer. CONCLUSIONS: Despite many technological advances, inappropriate ICD shocks still occur but at very low rates and SVT with 1:1 atrioventricular association represents their most common mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients (n=2,050). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy was evaluated on Inappropriate ICD therapies (shocks and antitachycardia pacing). In a cohort of 2,050 remotely monitored ICD patients, inappropriate shocks occurred in 1.6% of patients, most commonly due to supraventricular tachycardia with 1:1 atrioventricular association.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: