Younger age, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, stroke, and lack of diuretic use independently predict inappropriate ICD shocks, which occur in over 20% of patients but rarely cause proarrhythmia.
May identify high-risk patients for closer monitoring; leaves open whether targeted interventions reduce inappropriate shocks.
BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, inappropriate shocks can lead to multiple adverse effects. The aim of this study was to clarify the predictors of inappropriate ICD shocks and their proarrhythmic consequences. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively studied 316 consecutive patients who underwent ICD implantation from December 2000 to December 2011. Of them, 70 (22%) experienced inappropriate ICD shocks without proarrhythmia requiring some intervention; 2 patients (0.6%) had proarrhythmic inappropriate ICD therapy by antitachycardia pacing (ATP), thereby calculated to be 0.18% of patients per year. However, they did not have syncope from this inappropriate ATP. Multivariate analysis identified younger age (≤56 years: hazard ratio [HR] 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.77, P=0.043), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (HR 3.00, 95% CI 1.64-5.31, P=0.0002), stroke (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.11-4.47, P=0.024), and no diuretic use (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.03-2.93, P=0.039) as independent predictors of the occurrence of inappropriate ICD shocks. CONCLUSIONS: Young age, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, stroke, and no use of diuretics were independently associated with inappropriate ICD shocks. Proarrhythmic inappropriate ICD therapy was observed with an annual incidence of 0.18% by ATP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tenma et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: