Key result
Oral fluid testing successfully detects ADV DNA and antibodies in inoculated pigs while serum fails.
Why the study?
Detection of wild-type Aujeszky's disease virus infection relies on testing individual pig specimens, and oral fluid specimens could improve surveillance efficiency.
Can oral fluid specimens be used to detect Aujeszky's disease virus DNA and antibodies in ADV-inoculated pigs compared to serum specimens?
Can oral fluid specimens be used to detect Aujeszky's disease virus DNA and antibodies in ADV-inoculated pigs compared to serum specimens?
Oral fluid specimens can effectively detect Aujeszky's disease virus DNA and antibodies, offering a potential alternative to individual pig serum sampling for surveillance.
May support non-invasive ADV surveillance in swine; leaves open validation in field conditions and commercial herds.
Aujeszky's disease virus (ADV) continues to circulate in commercial swine populations in many regions and in feral swine populations in most parts of the world, that is, ADV continues to present a risk to pork producers everywhere. Current DIVA vaccines and assays are highly effective in the control and/or eradication of ADV, but detection of wild-type ADV infection relies on testing individual pig specimens, for example, serum or muscle exudate ("meat juice"). Oral fluid specimens have been shown to be highly effective for the surveillance of a variety of swine pathogens and could offer the means to improve the efficiency of ADV surveillance in the field. In this study, the temporal patterns of ADV DNA and antibody detection in oral fluid and serum specimens were established in ADV-inoculated pigs (n = 14) using gB and gE PCRs, virus neutralization (VN) and three commercial serum antibody ELISAs (gB bELISA, gI bELISA and ADV iELISA). ADV DNA was detected in oral fluid samples (20% to 100%) from 3 to 21 days postinoculation (DPI), but not in serum. ADV antibody was detected in oral fluid specimens at DPI ≥ 10 with the gB bELISA (36% to 79%) and ADV iELISA (29% to 100%), but not the gI bELISA. These results suggest that oral fluid could be used as an alternative to individual pig sampling for ADV surveillance using PCR- and/or antibody-based assays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panyasing et al. (2018) studied Aujeszky's disease virus (ADV) infection (n=14). Oral fluid sampling vs. Serum sampling was evaluated on Detection of ADV DNA and antibody. Oral fluid specimens successfully detected ADV DNA (20-100%) and antibodies (29-100%) in inoculated pigs, whereas ADV DNA was not detected in serum, supporting oral fluid for ADV surveillance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: