This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In the present study, we conducted internet surveillance to examine recognition of "Food with Function Claims" among consumers (n=2,060), physicians (n=515), and pharmacists (n=515). The ratio of recognition of "Food with Function Claims" was 81% among consumers, 93% among physicians, and 98% among pharmacists. However, only 16% of consumers, 23% of physicians, and 44% of pharmacists correctly understood the characteristics of "Food with Function Claims". Only 12% of consumers were using or have used "Food with Function Claims". Among "Food with Function Claims" users, 26% checked the information about "Food with Function Claims" on the website of the Consumer Affairs Agency, Government of Japan. Some of them used "Food with Function Claims" for treatment their diseases. In addition, some of them used "Food with Function Claims" and medicines concomitantly without consulting their physicians or pharmacists. Consequently, only 8% of physicians and pharmacists were asked about dietary supplement use by their patients, and 2% of physicians and pharmacists had consultations with their patients on adverse events associated with using "Food with Function Claims".
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiba et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: