Key result
Pregnancy in T1D is linked to ~40% lower macroalbuminuria prevalence and reduced proliferative retinopathy.
Why the study?
Pregnancy is believed to exacerbate diabetes complications in women with Type 1 diabetes, but the degree and clinical advice remain unclear.
Does parity exacerbate long-term maternal complications in women with Type 1 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,358)
Yes
Does parity exacerbate long-term maternal complications in women with Type 1 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 10%
p-value: p=<0.0001
In women with Type 1 diabetes, parity is associated with a lower prevalence of macroalbuminuria and proliferative retinopathy compared to nulliparity, suggesting pregnancy may not exacerbate these complications.
Should not yet change pregnancy counseling in T1D; leaves open selection bias versus protective effect.
Pregnancy is believed to exacerbate diabetes complications, although the degree to which this occurs, and the advice that should be given to women contemplating pregnancy is unclear. We examined 776 nulliparous and 582 parous women with Type 1 diabetes from a cross-sectional study performed in 31 European centres. Glycaemic control was better in parous women. Age and duration adjusted prevalence of microalbuminuria was similar in parous and nulliparous women, but macroalbuminuria was lower in parous women (6% versus 10%, p < 0.0001). Prevalence of all retinopathy was lower in parous women (34% in women who had two or more pregnancies, 45% in women who had one), compared with 48% in nulliparous women (chi 2 for trend = 47.1, p < 0.0001). Proliferative retinopathy was lower in parous (8% and 7%, respectively) compared with nulliparous women (16%, chi 2 for trend = 52.2, p < 0.0001). These differences persisted when adjusted for glycaemic control. Excluding referrals for pregnancy, parous women were more likely to have been referred to the diabetes clinic with complications than nulliparous women (p = 0.001). It is unlikely that our findings can be explained by women with complications being advised against pregnancy, or by the better glycaemic control in parous women. Equivalent levels of microalbuminuria and background retinopathy in parous and nulliparous women suggests that pregnancy may not exacerbate these early complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaturvedi et al. (1995) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 1 diabetes (n=1,358). Pregnancy (parity) vs. Nulliparity was evaluated on Macroalbuminuria (p=<0.0001). Pregnancy in women with Type 1 diabetes was associated with a lower prevalence of macroalbuminuria (6% vs 10%, p<0.0001) and proliferative retinopathy compared to nulliparous women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: