Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Endothelin-1 (ET-1) and urotensin-II (U-II) are the most potent constrictors of human vessels. Although the cavernosal tissue is higly responsive to ET-1, no information exists on the effects of U-II on cavernosal function. The aim of this study was to characterize ET-1 and U-II responses in corpora cavernosa from rats and mice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Male Wistar rats and C57/BL6 mice were used at 13 weeks. Cumulative concentration-response curves to ET-1, U-II and IRL-1620, an ET(B) agonist, were performed. ET-1 increased force generation in cavernosal strips from mice and rats, but no response to U-II was observed in the presence or absence of L-NAME, or in strips pre-stimulated with 20mM KCl. IRL-1620 did not induce cavernosal contraction even in presence of L-NAME, but induced a cavernosal relaxation which was greater in rats than mice. No relaxation responses to U-II were observed in cavernosal strips pre-contracted with phenylephrine. mRNA expression of ET-1, ET(A), ET(B) and U-II receptors, but not U-II was observed in cavernosal strips. CONCLUSION: ET-1, via ET(A) receptors activation, causes contractile responses in cavernosal strips from rats and mice whereas ET(B) receptor activation produces relaxation. Although the cavernosal tissue expresses U-II receptors, U-II does not induce contractile responses in corpora cavernosa from mice or rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carneiro et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: