Key result
Hand-grip exercise raises augmentation index ~10% and alters derived central BP versus the nonexercised arm.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether exercise-induced changes in vascular tone influence central pressure and augmentation index measures derived from the SphygmoCor device and its transfer function.
Does exercise-induced alteration in vascular tone influence derived measures of central pressure and augmentation index obtained from the SphygmoCor device?
Does exercise-induced alteration in vascular tone influence derived measures of central pressure and augmentation index obtained from the SphygmoCor device?
Mean Difference: 3
p-value: p=<0.05
Exercise-induced changes in vascular tone significantly alter central blood pressure and augmentation index derived from peripheral applanation tonometry, potentially compromising the assumptions underlying the transfer function.
May warrant caution in arm selection for post-exercise AIx/central BP; leaves open standardization needs for vascular protocols.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether measures derived from the SphygmoCor device and its associated transfer function are influenced by exercise-induced alterations in vascular tone. Measurements were taken from either the exercised or the contralateral nonexercised limb during repeated and identical incremental hand-grip protocols. Eight male subjects performed three 3-min bouts of hand-grip exercise on two occasions. The exercise intensities were set at 3 kg, 5 kg, with a final 1.5-kg bout performed during cuff ischemia (1.5Isch). Blood pressure waveforms were recorded from the radial artery of either the exercised or nonexercised limb using applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor) during a 90-s rest period immediately after each exercise bout. Central blood pressures and augmentation indexes (AIx), an index of arterial stiffness, were derived using the peripheral waveform and the inbuilt SphygmoCor transfer function (TF). AIx was consistently approximately 10% higher in the exercised arm during all trials compared with the nonexercised limb. Similarly, there was a consistent and significant difference ( approximately 3 mmHg; P < 0.05) between exercised and nonexercised arms for the derived central systolic and mean arterial blood pressures. Despite identical bouts of exercise, AIx and central systolic and mean arterial blood pressures derived from applanation tonometry at the peripheral radial artery were statistically different when assessed at the exercising arm vs. the nonexercising arm. Changes in vascular tone with exercise may modify the intrinsic characteristics of the vessel wall and could compromise the assumptions underlying transfer functions used to derive central measures using applanation tonometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dawson et al. (2009) studied this question. Hand-grip exercise vs. Nonexercised contralateral limb was evaluated on Derived central systolic and mean arterial blood pressures (MD ~3 mmHg, p=<0.05). Hand-grip exercise resulted in an augmentation index approximately 10% higher and derived central blood pressures approximately 3 mmHg different in the exercised arm versus the nonexercised arm (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: