Isothermal fatigue crack growth tests were performed at room temperature, 500 °C, and 700 °C, while thermomechanical fatigue (TMF)-crack growth tests with minimum and maximum temperatures of 400 °C and 700 °C, respectively, were conducted under various stress conditions on the heat-resistant austenitic cast iron EN–GJSA–XNiSiCr35–5–2 (commonly referred to as Ni–Resist D-5S). Both isothermal and TMF experiments revealed an increase in crack growth rate with rising force ratio R . In the TMF tests, in-phase loading resulted in a higher crack growth rate compared to out-of-phase loading. A comparative assessment of different in-situ crack length measurement techniques − including the potential drop method, compliance measurement, and thermography − was carried out. In addition, microstructural analyses of crack propagation mechanisms were performed concurrently with the experiments
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gesell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: