Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Effective thermal management is essential for the safe operation of lithium-ion batteries under varying discharge conditions. This study experimentally investigates a passive battery thermal management system (BTMS) using paraffin-based phase change material (PCM) and graphite-enhanced composite PCM (CPCM). Graphite contents of 4.0%, 6.4%, 8.0%, and 12.0 wt% were evaluated under discharge currents of 2–10 A over 300 s, with battery surface temperatures compared for no-BTMS, PCM, and CPCM configurations. Thermophysical properties were measured, and a theoretical energy balance was used to estimate battery heat generation. The findings demonstrate that the battery pack without BTMS exhibits the highest temperature rise under all tested conditions, while paraffin-based PCM effectively reduces the rate of temperature rise. Graphite addition further enhances heat transport and delays thermal saturation. At 8 A, the CPCM system reduced battery-retained sensible heat by approximately 60% ± 9 pp compared with the no-BTMS case, versus 44% ± 9 pp for pure PCM. The results highlight the trade-off between enhanced thermal conductivity and reduced latent heat capacity with increasing graphite content. A supplementary replicated campaign at elevated initial temperatures (≈30–35 °C) confirmed that the 6.4 wt% CPCM, with its higher latent-heat capacity, provides better temperature control than the 8.0 wt% formulation as melting is approached.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deshmukh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: