Key result
Prolonged work in the heat does not alter next-day HRV in older men.
Why the study?
The effects of prolonged work in the heat on heart rate variability, a surrogate of cardiac autonomic modulation, in older workers remain unclear.
Does prolonged work in the heat modulate next-day heart rate variability in older men?
Does prolonged work in the heat modulate next-day heart rate variability in older men?
p-value: p=>0.05
Prolonged work in the heat does not modulate next-day heart rate variability in older men, indicating HRV is not a useful marker to identify exacerbated heat strain over consecutive work shifts.
HRV should not yet guide monitoring of consecutive heat shifts in older men; leaves open its value as a strain marker in larger cohorts.
Susceptibility to heat illness during physically demanding work in hot environments is greater on the second of two consecutive workdays. While it has been demonstrated that heat storage is exacerbated on the second compared to first workday in older workers (50–65 yr), the effects on heart rate variability (HRV), an established surrogate of cardiac autonomic modulation, remain unclear. This study evaluated HRV in older workers on the day following prolonged work in the heat. Electrocardiogram was recorded in nine older (53–64 yr) males at rest, during three 30-min bouts of semi-recumbent cycling at fixed rates of metabolic heat production (150, 200, 250 W/m2), each separated by 15-min recovery. Experiments were conducted in hot-dry conditions (40 °C, 20% relative humidity), immediately prior to (Day 1), and on the day following (Day 2), a prolonged work simulation (∼7.5 hr) involving moderate intensity intermittent exercise in hot-dry conditions (38 °C, 34% relative humidity). Core temperature, as well as time, frequency, and nonlinear HRV indices were derived for analysis during rest, the final 5-min of exercise at the highest heat production and recovery. The change in core temperature at the end of work (mean ±SD) was significantly greater on Day 2 (1.0 °C ±0.3) relative to Day 1 (0.8 °C ±0.2; p < 0.01). Heart rate, however, did not significantly differ between days 1 and 2 at rest (Day 1, 59 ±11 bpm; Day 2, 62 ±13 bpm), during exercise (Day 1, 113 ±21 bpm; Day 2, 114 ±18 bpm ) and at the end of recovery (Day 1, 75 ±16 bpm; Day 2, 76 ±12 bpm). Likewise, there were no significant differences in any HRV indices derived from time, frequency, and nonlinear domains (all p > 0.05). Prolonged work in the heat did not modulate next-day heart rhythms, as reflected by HRV, despite augmented core temperature. While HRV can reflect physiological aspects of cardiac autonomic stressors, these findings indicate it does not provide a means to identify exacerbated heat strain in older workers over consecutive work shifts in the heat.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Macartney et al. (2020) studied Heat strain (n=9). Prolonged work in the heat vs. Day 1 (prior to prolonged work) was evaluated on Heart rate variability (HRV) indices (p=>0.05). Prolonged work in the heat did not significantly modulate next-day heart rate variability indices in older men (all p > 0.05), despite an augmented core temperature.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: