Key result
Higher income and education linked to ~18% better DOAC adherence.
Why the study?
Little is known about socioeconomic disparities in adherence to stroke prevention with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Does higher income or educational level improve adherence to DOAC therapy in patients with incident atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=74,222)
Yes
Does higher income or educational level improve adherence to DOAC therapy in patients with incident atrial fibrillation?
Higher income and educational levels are independently associated with better initial implementation of DOAC therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation, but do not affect long-term therapy persistence.
Low socioeconomic status has been associated with poor outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about socioeconomic disparities in adherence to stroke prevention with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We assessed the hypothesis that AF patients with higher income or educational levels have better adherence to DOACs in terms of treatment implementation and persistence. The used nationwide registry‐based FinACAF cohort covers all patients with incident AF starting DOACs in Finland during 2011–2018. The implementation analyses included 74 222 (mean age 72.7 ± 10.5 years, 50.8% female) patients, and persistence analyses included 67 503 (mean age 75.3 ± 8.9 years, 53.6% female) patients with indication for permanent anticoagulation (CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score >1 in men and >2 in women). Patients were divided into income quartiles and into three categories based on their educational attainment. Therapy implementation was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR), and patients with MPR ≥0.90 were defined adherent. Persistence was measured as the incidence of therapy discontinuation, defined as the first 135‐day period without DOAC purchases after drug initiation. Patients with higher income or education were consistently more likely adherent to DOACs in the implementation phase (comparing the highest income or educational category to the lowest: adjusted odds ratios 1.18 (1.12–1.25) and 1.21 (1.15–1.27), respectively). No association with income or educational levels was observed on the incidence of therapy discontinuation. In conclusion, we observed that income and educational levels both have independent positive association on the implementation of DOAC therapy but no association on therapy persistence in patients with AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teppo et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in incident atrial fibrillation (n=74,222). Higher income or educational levels vs. Lowest income or educational category was evaluated on Adherence to DOACs in the implementation phase (MPR ≥0.90) (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.25). Higher income and educational levels were associated with better adherence to DOAC therapy in the implementation phase (adjusted OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.12-1.25 for highest vs lowest income).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: