Key result
Supine radial AI strongly correlates with carotid AI and modestly with aortic PWV.
Why the study?
The relationship between radial artery augmentation index and central arterial stiffness, a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, was not fully characterized.
Does radial artery augmentation index correlate with central arterial stiffness indices in adult subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
Does radial artery augmentation index correlate with central arterial stiffness indices in adult subjects?
Effect estimate: r=0.850
p-value: p=<0.001
Augmentation index obtained directly from the radial artery provides equivalent information to central arterial AI, regardless of lying or sitting posture.
Radial AI may proxy central measures in adults; leaves open its added value for risk stratification in prospective studies.
We studied relationships between radial artery augmentation index (AI) and central arterial stiffness, an identified risk factor of future cardiovascular diseases, in 49 males and 51 females (age: 19∼73 yrs). Radial artery AI was calculated from radial arterial pressure waveforms in supine and in sitting positions by applanation tonometry-based automated radial AI measurement device (HEM-9010AI, Omron). Carotid artery AI and aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) were measured in supine resting by automated PWV measurement system (form PWV/ABI, Colin MT) as indices of central arterial stiffness. Radial AI measured in supine position correlated with counterparts measured in sitting position (r=0.931, P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in these indices (80.9 ± 17.5 vs. 81.0 ± 15.3, mean ± SD). Radial AI measured in supine position had a strong correlation with carotid AI (r=0.850, P<0.001) and a modest correlation with aortic PWV (r=0.472, P<0.0001) in whole subjects. Correlation coefficients between radial AI and aortic PWV were larger in males (r=0.588, P<0.0001) and females (r=0.553, P<0.0001) than that in whole subjects. The most used approach to obtain central arterial AI is to perform radial artery tonometry and then apply a transfer function to calculate the aortic pressure waveform from the radial waveform. Our results suggest that AI obtained directly from radial artery can give equivalent information of central arterial AI, regardless of measurement posture (i.e., lying and sitting).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugawara et al. (2005) reported a cross-sectional. Radial artery augmentation index (AI) vs. Central arterial stiffness indices (carotid AI and aortic PWV) was evaluated on Correlation between radial AI and carotid AI (r=0.850, p=<0.001). Radial artery augmentation index measured in the supine position strongly correlated with carotid augmentation index (r=0.850, P<0.001) and modestly with aortic pulse wave velocity (r=0.472, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: