Key result
Busulfan-Melphalan is linked to higher severe acute toxicity risk than VAI regardless of age.
Why the study?
The risk of acute toxicity associated with Busulfan-Melphalan compared to standard chemotherapy in Ewing sarcoma patients and its variation by age was unclear.
Does Busulfan-Melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation increase severe acute toxicity compared to standard chemotherapy across different age groups in patients with Ewing sarcoma?
RCT (n=448)
Randomized
Yes
Does Busulfan-Melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation increase severe acute toxicity compared to standard chemotherapy across different age groups in patients with Ewing sarcoma?
The excess acute toxicity of Busulfan-Melphalan compared to standard chemotherapy in Ewing sarcoma does not vary significantly by age, suggesting its feasibility across all age groups.
Supports age-independent toxicity with Busulfan-Melphalan in Ewing sarcoma; leaves open optimal regimen choice pending randomized evidence.
INTRODUCTION: Ewing sarcoma (ES), is a rare cancer affecting children, adolescents and adults. After VIDE (vincristine-ifosfamide-doxorobucin-etoposide) induction chemotherapy, Busulfan-Melphalan (BuMel) high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation improved outcomes in unfavourable localized ES, but with more toxicities than conventional chemotherapy (VAI: Vincristine-dactinomycin-Ifosfamide). We evaluated whether the risk of acute toxicity associated with BuMel compared to VAI varied according to age in patients recruited in the R2Loc and R2Pulm randomised trials of the Euro-E.W.I.N.G.99 and Ewing-2008 trials. METHODS: We included patients with a localized high-risk disease, or pulmonary or pleural metastasis. We analysed the risk of severe toxicity according to randomised treatment group (VAI versus BuMel) and age group (<12 years, 12-17 years, 18-24 years, ≥25 years). We evaluated the heterogeneity of treatment effects by age group using interaction terms in logistic multivariable models. RESULTS: The analysis included 243 patients treated with VAI and 205 with BuMel. Overall, BuMel was associated with a higher risk of severe acute toxicity than VAI particularly haematological, gastrointestinal, liver, sinusoidal occlusive syndrome, and infections. Severe haematological toxicity and lower general condition were significantly more frequent in younger patients, whatever treatment. We did not observe any significant heterogeneity in terms of the excess risk of severe toxicities associated with BuMel compared to VAI according to age group. CONCLUSION: The excess of acute toxicity associated with BuMel compared to VAI does not vary significantly with age, suggesting the feasibility of BuMel across all age groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laclos et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Ewing sarcoma (n=448). Busulfan-Melphalan (BuMel) high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation vs. VAI (Vincristine-dactinomycin-Ifosfamide) conventional chemotherapy was evaluated on Severe acute toxicity. Busulfan-Melphalan was associated with a higher risk of severe acute toxicity than VAI, but this excess risk did not vary significantly across age groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: