Key result
Elevated NLR and PLR are linked to stable ischemic heart disease in T2DM.
Why the study?
The role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in screening for stable ischemic heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is not well defined.
Do neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio predict the presence of stable ischemic heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Observational
Do neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio predict the presence of stable ischemic heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.652 for NLR (95% CI 0.605-0.699)
p-value: p=<.001
While neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio are significantly elevated in diabetic patients with stable ischemic heart disease, they have limited diagnostic utility as standalone predictive markers.
Limited diagnostic utility as standalone markers in T2DM; hypothesis-generating for inflammatory ratios in ischemic risk assessment.
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a pressing public health concern with high prevalence, mortality, and morbidity. Although the value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as markers of the acute coronary syndrome are well recognized, there is a paucity of data deciphering their role in screening for stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) in the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The present study investigates the value of NLR and PLR as markers of SIHD in T2DM. We evaluated the predictive value of NLR and PLR for SIHD by comparing T2DM patients having angiographically proven SIHD to T2DM patients without IHD at different cutoff levels by evaluating the area under the curve (AUC) obtained from receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. Raised NLR and PLR were significantly associated with SIHD ( P < .001 for each). On performing AUC-receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, NLR of > 2.39 and PLR of > 68.80 were associated with the highest prevalence of SIHD (NLR, AUC: 0.652 [0.605-0.699]; CI: 95%; P < .001, PLR, AUC: 0.623 [0.575-0.671] CI: 95%; P < .001). The sensitivities and specificities for these cutoff values were 50% and 73% for NLR and 73% and 46% for PLR, respectively. NLR and PLR were significantly higher in SIHD compared to those without; however, these markers had limited predictive potential in the setting of T2DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joshi et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Stable ischemic heart disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) vs. Patients without ischemic heart disease was evaluated on Predictive value for stable ischemic heart disease (Area Under the Curve) (AUC 0.652 for NLR, 95% CI 0.605-0.699, p=<.001). Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio >2.39 and platelet-lymphocyte ratio >68.80 were associated with stable ischemic heart disease in T2DM (AUC 0.652 and 0.623, respectively; P<0.001 for both).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: