Key result
Unilateral and particularly right-sided BAT lowers BP and HR more than bilateral stimulation.
Why the study?
Previous trials showed BAT reduces blood pressure in resistant hypertension, but the necessity of bilateral electrode implantation may limit technique development.
Does unilateral baroreflex activation therapy improve blood pressure reduction compared to bilateral stimulation in patients with resistant hypertension?
RCT (n=295)
randomized
Does unilateral baroreflex activation therapy improve blood pressure reduction compared to bilateral stimulation in patients with resistant hypertension?
Unilateral, particularly right-sided, baroreflex activation therapy may be more effective than bilateral stimulation for reducing blood pressure in resistant hypertension.
Unilateral BAT may yield comparable BP reductions to bilateral in resistant hypertension; leaves open whether it can supplant bilateral implantation pending randomized data.
UNLABELLED: Previous trials have shown that in patients with resistant hypertension device-based baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) can substantially reduce blood pressure. However, the fact that electrodes had to be implanted bilaterally may be a drawback for further development of the technique. In this study, we explored whether unilateral stimulation would produce comparable results as bilateral stimulation. In the Pivotal trial, treatment-resistant hypertensive patients were randomized to receive either immediate BAT or deferred BAT, that is, 6 months after implantation. We adjusted stimulation parameters individually so as to provide optimal baroreflex activation. Unilateral stimulation was applied unless bilateral stimulation resulted in a greater blood pressure reduction. When we pooled the 6-month data for the group with immediate BAT and the 12-month data for the group with deferred BAT, a total of 215 patients had been stimulated on one side only (127 at the right side and 88 at the left side), whereas 80 patients had been stimulated bilaterally. Although blood pressure and heart rate did not differ between the 2 groups at baseline, all these variables were significantly lower in the unilateral than in the bilateral group after the 6-month period. When we compared the effect of right-sided stimulation with those of either left-sided or bilateral stimulation, we found right-sided stimulation to be the most effective. We conclude that unilateral and in particular right-sided BAT has a more profound effect on blood pressure than bilateral or left-sided BAT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00442286.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leeuw et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in treatment-resistant hypertension (n=295). Unilateral baroreflex activation therapy vs. Bilateral baroreflex activation therapy was evaluated on Blood pressure and heart rate. Unilateral, and particularly right-sided, baroreflex activation therapy produced significantly lower blood pressure and heart rate compared to bilateral stimulation after 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: