Key result
Bioactive tripeptides inhibit ACE1 with ~1000-fold greater potency than ACE2 in ocular tissue.
Why the study?
An active local renin-angiotensin system has been found in the human eye, but activities of ACE1 and ACE2 in porcine ocular tissues and their inhibition by bioactive peptides were not characterized.
ACE1 and ACE2 are active in porcine ocular tissues, and ACE-inhibitory tripeptides preferentially inhibit ACE1, suggesting a potential role in regulating ocular circulation and pressure.
No change to ocular care indicated; leaves open ACE1-selective tripeptide effects in eye disease models.
PURPOSE: An active local renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has recently been found in the human eye. The aim of the present study was to compare the activities of central RAS enzymes (ACE1 and 2) in porcine ocular tissues, morphologically and physiologically close to the human eye. In addition, the effects of three ACE-inhibitory tripeptides on these enzymes were evaluated. METHODS: Enucleated fresh porcine eyes were used. Activities of ACE1 and ACE2 and their inhibition by bioactive tripeptides (Ile-Pro-Pro, Val-Pro-Pro, Leu-Pro-Pro) as well as by a standard ACE-inhibitor captopril were assayed in the vitreous body, the retina and the ciliary body using fluorometric detection methods. RESULTS: Activity of ACE1 as well as ACE2 was found in all tissues evaluated. ACE1 activity was markedly higher in the ciliary body (3.7 +/- 0.7 mU/mg protein) than in retina (0.2 +/- 0.02 mU/mg), whereas ACE2 activities in the ciliary body (0.2 +/- 0.02 mU/mg) and retina (0.2 +/- 0.01 mU/mg) were at the same level. In the vitreous body ACE1 activity (8.2 +/- 0.31 nmol/min/mL) was manifold compared to that of ACE2 (0.1 +/- 0.02 nmol/min/mL). The tripeptides inhibited ACE1 at one-thousandth of the concentration needed to inhibit ACE2. All peptides studied evinced about equal inhibitory activities. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge the present findings constitute the first evidence of ACE2 activity in the ciliary and vitreous bodies, in addition to previously described activity in the retina. The known favorable effects of ACE2 products vs. those of ACE1 suggest a counterbalancing interaction of these two enzyme homologues in physiological regulation of ocular circulation and pressure and possible protective role in certain ophthalmic disorders such as glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luhtala et al. (2009) studied this question. Bioactive tripeptides (Ile-Pro-Pro, Val-Pro-Pro, Leu-Pro-Pro) vs. Captopril was evaluated on Activities of ACE1 and ACE2 and their inhibition. Bioactive tripeptides inhibited ACE1 at one-thousandth of the concentration needed to inhibit ACE2 in porcine ocular tissues, where both enzymes were found to be active.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: