Key result
Moderate 500-m treadmill test accurately estimates VO2peak in men with HFrEF.
Why the study?
Maximal CPX is the gold standard for cardiorespiratory fitness assessment in CHF but is impractical for mobility-impaired adults, necessitating valid submaximal tests at moderate intensity.
Does a moderate 500-m treadmill-walking test accurately estimate VO2peak compared to maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing in men with NYHA class I-II HFrEF?
Cross-Sectional (n=43)
No
Does a moderate 500-m treadmill-walking test accurately estimate VO2peak compared to maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing in men with NYHA class I-II HFrEF?
Effect estimate: R = 0.97
Absolute Event Rate: 21.7% vs 21.6%
p-value: p=<0.0001
A moderate, self-paced 500-m treadmill-walking test accurately estimates VO2peak in stable men with mild-to-moderate HFrEF, offering a practical alternative to maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
Supports moderate 500-m treadmill walk for VO2peak estimation in HFrEF outpatients; leaves open prospective validation before routine clinical adoption.
Maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is the gold-standard for cardiorespiratory fitness assessment in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. However, high costs, required medical supervision, and safety concerns make maximal exercise testing impractical for evaluating mobility-impaired adults. Thus, several submaximal walking protocols have been developed and currently used to estimate peak oxygen consumption (VO 2 peak) in CHF patients. However, these tests have to be performed at close to maximum exercise intensity. The aim of this study was to examine the validity of a 500-m treadmill-walking test carried out at moderate intensity for estimating VO 2 peak in community-dwelling adult and elderly patients with CHF and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). Forty-three clinically stable men with HFrEF (age 67.7 ± 9.2 years, and left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF 38% ± 6%) underwent exercise testing during an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention program. Each patients completed a CPX, and a moderate and self-paced (11–13/20 on the Borg scale) 500-m treadmill-walking test. Age, weight, height, walk time, and heart rate during the 500-m test were entered into prediction equations previously validated for VO 2 peak estimation from a 1000-m walking test in patients with cardiovascular disease and preserved LVEF. Directly measured and estimated VO 2 peak values were not different (21.6 ± 4.9 vs 21.7 ± 4.6 mL/kg/min). The comparison between measured and estimated VO 2 peak values yielded a correlation of R = 0.97 (SEE = 0.7 mL/kg/min, P < 0.0001). The slope and the intercept coincided with the line of identity (Passing and Bablock analysis, P = 0.50). Residuals were normally distributed, and the examination of the Bland-Altman analysis do not show systematic or proportional error. A moderate and self-regulated 500-m treadmill-walking test is a valid tool for VO 2 peak estimation in patients with HFrEF. These findings may have practical implications in the context of transitioning from clinically based programs to fitness facilities or self-guided exercise programs in adults and elderly men with HFrEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazzoni et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=43). 500-m moderate treadmill-walking test vs. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) was evaluated on Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) (R = 0.97, p=<0.0001). A moderate 500-m treadmill-walking test accurately estimated peak oxygen uptake in men with HFrEF, demonstrating a strong correlation (R = 0.97, P < 0.0001) with directly measured values.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: