Key result
Capecitabine is linked to rare hypertriglyceridemia, manageable with lipid-lowering therapy and temporary drug discontinuation.
Why the study?
Capecitabine-induced hypertriglyceridemia is a rare but clinically relevant adverse event with potential acute and chronic complications that requires better understanding and management.
Case Report
Capecitabine-induced hypertriglyceridemia is a rare but clinically relevant adverse event that requires monitoring and management to prevent acute pancreatitis and chronic cardiovascular disease.
May warrant triglyceride monitoring on capecitabine; leaves open incidence, causality, and management in prospective cohorts.
Capecitabine-induced hypertriglyceridemia (CIHT) represents an increasingly significant treatment-related adverse event from capecitabine given its potential for both acute complications (acute pancreatitis) and chronic metabolic complications (cardiovascular disease). The incidence of CIHT is relatively rare and the majority of cases thus far reported have been managed with lipid-lowering therapy and/or discontinuation of capecitabine followed by resumption of the drug upon normalization of triglyceride levels. We present among the first U.S. cases of CIHT to be reported in the published literature and highlight management approaches for this rare but clinically relevant adverse event. Further understanding of the mechanisms of CIHT and its long-term adverse effects as well as effective preventive strategies, interventions, and monitoring strategies are prudent given the widespread and often prolonged use of capecitabine-based chemotherapy in gastrointestinal and other cancers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uche et al. (2018) conducted a case report in Capecitabine-induced hypertriglyceridemia. Capecitabine was evaluated on Hypertriglyceridemia. Capecitabine exposure can lead to hypertriglyceridemia, a rare but clinically relevant adverse event manageable with lipid-lowering therapy and temporary drug discontinuation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: