Key result
Ticagrelor monotherapy cuts BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding ~48% vs. dual therapy.
Why the study?
The treatment effects of ticagrelor monotherapy in very high risk patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease undergoing PCI were not well defined.
Does ticagrelor monotherapy reduce bleeding compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin in high-risk patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease after PCI?
RCT (n=6,273)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does ticagrelor monotherapy reduce bleeding compared to ticagrelor plus aspirin in high-risk patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease after PCI?
Hazard Ratio: 0.52 (95% CI 0.25–1.07)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.7% vs 8.7%
Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of DAPT safely reduces bleeding without increasing ischemic events in PCI patients, including the very high-risk subgroup with both diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
Supports ticagrelor monotherapy after short DAPT in DM+/CKD+ post-PCI patients; extends prior trial evidence to this very high-risk subgroup.
AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the treatment effects of ticagrelor monotherapy in the very high risk cohort of patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor with Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial, after 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor and aspirin post-PCI, event-free patients were randomized to either aspirin or placebo in addition to ticagrelor for 12 months. Those with available information on DM and CKD status were included in this subanalysis and were stratified by the presence or absence of either condition: 3391 (54.1%) had neither DM nor CKD (DM-/CKD-), 1822 (29.0%) had DM only (DM+/CKD-), 561 (8.9%) had CKD only (DM-/CKD+), and 8.0% had both DM and CKD (DM+/CKD+). The incidence of the primary endpoint of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding did not differ according to DM/CKD status (P-trend = 0.13), but there was a significant increase in BARC 3 or 5 bleeding (P-trend < 0.001) as well as the key secondary endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (P-trend < 0.001). Ticagrelor plus placebo reduced bleeding events compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin across all four groups, including DM+/CKD+ patients with respect to BARC 2-5 [4.5% vs. 8.7%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-1.01] as well as BARC 3-5 (0.8% vs. 5.3%; HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.53) bleeding, with no evidence of heterogeneity. The risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was similar between treatment arms across all groups. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the presence of DM, CKD, and their combination, ticagrelor monotherapy reduced the risk of bleeding without a significant increase in ischaemic events compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dehghani et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in High-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with or without diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease (n=6,273). Ticagrelor monotherapy (Ticagrelor plus placebo) vs. Ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (81-100 mg daily) was evaluated on Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding up to 1 year after randomization (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.25-1.07). Ticagrelor monotherapy reduced the risk of BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin across all groups, including patients with concomitant diabetes and chronic kidney disease (4.7% vs. 8.7%; HR 0.52).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: