Key result
Maximal h1 amplitude method matches ultrasound for pulse width and correlates with high BP.
Why the study?
Pulse width is used in traditional Chinese medicine for diagnosis and prognosis, but an objective measurement method was lacking.
Does the maximal h1 amplitude method accurately measure pulse width compared to color Doppler ultrasound in volunteers?
Observational
Does the maximal h1 amplitude method accurately measure pulse width compared to color Doppler ultrasound in volunteers?
An objective method using an array pulse diagram and maximal h1 amplitude accurately measures pulse width, correlating with ultrasound measurements and differentiating normal from high blood pressure.
May support non-invasive pulse width assessment in hypertension; hypothesis-generating and requires larger validation before clinical adoption.
Background Pulse width, which can reflect qi, blood excess, and deficiency, has been used for diagnosing diseases and determining the prognosis in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). This study aimed to devise an objective method to measure the pulse width based on an array pulse diagram for objective diagnosis. Methods The channel 6, the region wherein the pulse wave signal is the strongest, is located in the middle of the pulse sensor array and at the guan position of cunkou during data collection. Therefore, the main wave (h 1 ) time of the pulse wave was collected from the channel 6 through calculation. The left h 1 time was collected from the remaining 11 channels. The amplitudes at these time points were extracted as the h 1 amplitudes for each channel. However, the pulse width could not be calculated accurately at 12 points. Consequently, a bioharmonic spline interpolation algorithm was used to interpolate the h 1 amplitude data obtained from the horizontal and vertical points, yielding 651 (31 × 21) h 1 amplitude data. The 651 data points were converted into a heat map to intuitively calculate the pulse width. The pulse width was calculated by multiplying the number of grids on the vertical axis with the unit length of the grid. The pulse width was determined by TCM doctors to verify the pulse width measurement accuracy. Meanwhile, a color Doppler ultrasound examination of the volunteers’ radial arteries was performed and the intravascular meridian widths of the radial artery compared with the calculated pulse widths to determine the reliability. Results The pulse width determined using the maximal h 1 amplitude method was comparable with the radial artery intravascular meridian widths measured using color Doppler ultrasound. The h 1 amplitude was higher in the high blood pressure group and the pulse width was greater. Conclusions The pulse width determined using the maximal h 1 amplitude was objective and accurate. Comparison between the pulse widths of the normal and high blood pressure groups verified the reliability of the method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bi et al. (2024) conducted an observational in High blood pressure. Maximal h1 amplitude method for pulse width measurement vs. Color Doppler ultrasound was evaluated on Pulse width measurement accuracy and reliability. Pulse width determined using the maximal h1 amplitude method was comparable with radial artery widths measured by ultrasound and was greater in patients with high blood pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: