Key result
Combination chemotherapy shows no 3-year overall survival benefit over surgery alone in localized extraskeletal osteosarcoma.
Why the study?
Extraskeletal osteosarcoma is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis, and the oncological outcomes related to surgery and combination chemotherapy remain unclear.
Does combination chemotherapy improve overall survival or progression-free survival in patients with extraskeletal osteosarcoma undergoing surgical resection?
Cohort (n=22)
No
Does combination chemotherapy improve overall survival or progression-free survival in patients with extraskeletal osteosarcoma undergoing surgical resection?
Absolute Event Rate: 75.4% vs 75%
p-value: p=0.638
In patients with extraskeletal osteosarcoma, larger tumor size and higher histologic grade are associated with worse overall survival, while adjuvant combination chemotherapy does not appear to improve survival outcomes.
Adjuvant chemotherapy should not yet alter management; leaves open need for prospective trials to confirm lack of benefit.
Extraskeletal osteosarcoma (ESOS) is an extremely rare malignancy with poor prognosis, accounting for 2-4% of all osteogenic sarcomas. The purpose of this study was to examine the oncological outcomes of this disease related to surgical treatment and/or combined adjuvant therapies and to analyze the associated prognostic factors in ESOS. From January 1990 to June 2016, 22 patients with primary ESOS were analyzed in this retrospective study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods and compared with log-rank test. 22 patients were diagnosed with ESOS, 19 showed localized diseases and 3 presented with metastatic lesions. The median age at diagnosis was 55.5 years. Surgery resection was performed for all patients, 18 of whom received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up time was 48.5 months. There were 10 cases of recurrence and 9 patients developed new metastases. The 5-year OS rate for all patients was 58%. For localized cohort, the 5-year OS rate was 62%, and the 3-year PFS rate was 31% with a median PFS of 16 months. Univariate analysis of related prognosis factors showed that larger size of tumor (>5.5 cm) and higher histologic grade emerged as significant factors associated with worse OS. The addition of combination chemotherapy has no effect found on OS or PFS in this study. In summary, for patients who presented with ESOS, larger tumor size and higher histologic grade indicate a lower OS rate. The combination chemotherapy does not improve the OS or PFS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Extraskeletal osteosarcoma (n=22). Combination chemotherapy vs. No chemotherapy was evaluated on 3-year overall survival (p=0.638). In patients with localized extraskeletal osteosarcoma, the addition of combination chemotherapy did not significantly improve the 3-year overall survival rate compared to surgery alone (75.4% vs 75.0%, p=0.638).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: