Key result
VSARR is linked to an ~11% absolute reduction in anticoagulation-related bleeding and thromboembolism versus Bentall.
Why the study?
The mid-term and long-term efficacies of valve preservation in acute DeBakey I aortic dissection are controversial, creating uncertainty about the optimal surgical approach for middle-aged patients in emergency settings.
Does valve-sparing aortic root replacement improve mid-term outcomes compared to the Bentall procedure in middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I aortic dissection?
Cohort (n=213)
No
Does valve-sparing aortic root replacement improve mid-term outcomes compared to the Bentall procedure in middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I aortic dissection?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I aortic dissection, valve-sparing aortic root replacement offers similar survival to the Bentall procedure but significantly reduces the risk of thromboembolism, bleeding, and aortic valve re-operation.
Background: The mid-term and long-term efficacies of valve preservation in acute DeBakey I aortic dissection(AD) are controversial. Thus, it is unclear whether middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I AD should undergo valve-sparing procedures or the Bentall procedure in an emergency setting.Methods: This study included 213 middle-aged Chinese patients(30-60 years old) who were treated for acute DeBakey I AD between January 2009 and June 2015. The treatments involved valve-sparing aortic root replacement(VSARR)(117 patients) or the Bentall procedure(96 patients). Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up data were analyzed. Echocardiography and thoracoabdominal computed tomography angiography(CTA) findings were reviewed at 3 months, 1 year, and then annually after surgery. Results: No significant differences were observed in terms of the preoperative, intraoperative, in-hospital mortality, and postoperative parameters. There were also no significant differences in aortic regurgitation(AR). However, follow-up examinations using CTA revealed that 6 patients had endoleakage at the distal end of the triple-branched stent(0/110 patients [0.0%] vs. 6/90 patients [6.7%], P=0.022). The anticoagulation-related thromboembolism/bleeding events was significantly lower in group A than in group B(0/110 patients [0.0%] vs. 11/90 patients [11.1%], P=0.001). And postoperative aortic valve re-operation rate was significantly lower in group A (1/110 patients [0.9%] vs. 8/90 patients [8.9%], P=0.020). There was no significant difference in survival during the follow-up period (log-rank P>0.05).Conclusion: For middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I AD, VSARR were associated with a lower rate of endoleakage at the distal end of the triple-branched stent, thromboembolism/bleeding events and aortic valve re-operation(vs. the Bentall procedure) .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute DeBakey I aortic dissection (n=213). Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) vs. Bentall procedure was evaluated on Anticoagulation-related thromboembolism/bleeding events (p=0.001). Valve-sparing aortic root replacement significantly reduced anticoagulation-related thromboembolism and bleeding events compared to the Bentall procedure (0.0% vs 11.1%, p=0.001) in middle-aged patients with acute DeBakey I aortic dissection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: